Category Archives: culture

shutdown and identity

There is a pretty thought provoking article in the Washington Post. I got to it when I saw this Tweet: “When your identity is tied up in your career, something like the shutdown can make you rethink a few things” READ Post article here and then ask yourself, what is MY identity based on? can I lose that basis? If so then where am I?

CSLewis said not to base our happiness on something we can lose. Forget happiness, let’s not base our identity on what the heck we DO (that includes ESPECIALLY means us pastor types) and can lose!

Leave a comment

Filed under culture

the line of scrimmage

Imagine a football* game in the biggest stadium you can imagine. Got it? Okay, now imagine there are ten players on the field. No quarterback, no back field, no defensive secondary, there’s not even a ball to be seen on the field. What you see is a picture of our U.S. political “leaders.”

They are just running into each other on the line of scrimmage, all suffering from multiple concussions, not knowing where to go next. They just run head on into each other.

God help the USA.

(*American football for my non USA readers)

Leave a comment

Filed under culture

whose fault, this shutdown?

WARNING: THIS IS A POLITICS POST

Blaming is a popular human sport. Usually, we blame others, anyone but me and my crowd. The shutdown: whose fault is it? I’m tempted to say it’s really no one group at fault, but is instead the result of a clash of ideas. A clash of ideas which has its roots in that which makes us American. Independence.

When I compare our culture to others, I am always struck by this word. Independence. Our most important founding document? Arguably, the Declaration of …Independence (it’s text is here… it takes about 10 minutes to read, if you never have, you should).

When I stopped and read the Declaration of Independence just now, I thought of where we came from and what we were declaring ourselves free of: British tyranny.  As I read it, I realized, being an independent sort, that I resonated with it and that, as I read it, I felt shadows of that long gone tyrant, that British King upon our current situation. I felt a tyranny.

Indeed, in the 237 years since, this nation and its government has grown to such a great size and power and complexity that I shudder to think of what exactly the founders would think. Other minds who are competent to discuss those thinkers of the past will have to weigh in on that (and I doubt that there will be an agreement among them either).

We are indeed under a new tyrant. I do not know her name, but she is certainly not called Wisdom. This new tyrant without name is one whose core attributes are divisiveness, self-aggrandizement and of re-election, and perhaps if not re-election, of obstruction. Some of the members of this tyranny are the members of Congress. But are they at fault? One man’s answer is “No, we elected them.” So are we at fault?

I say “No” again. I say no because our choices are so poor. Look at your last congressional election. Who were your choices? Were you able to choose well because of the way your candidates thought? I couldn’t. Did they, do they… think at all or just follow their party leader? Are they allowed to think? Isn’t it the job of the party whip to keep them from thinking and just vote a certain way?

It would appear that in the current Congress the only people doing any real thinking are the ones who are the obstructionists. Those who may well bring a level of destruction on Mr. Lincoln’s party that will take many years to recover from. Their apparent leader is is not even a member of their own house, he is an eschewed member of the Senate. He seems to be the only one standing on his principles and therefore he is being followed (misguided path that it may be). Certainly the honorable Speaker of the House is not leading, he is only interested in keeping the Speaker’s gavel.

So, again, this unnamed Tyranny which, again, has as its most common attributes divisiveness, self-aggrandizement and of re-election. But, not just re-election, that is not common to them all. Some of them have as their third attribute obstructionism. But we don’t elect the whole House, we only elect our member. Look at that choice for a moment please.

Look please at your own congressional district. Did you get to choose between thinkers? Look at the way your state legislature has drawn the district. What are the chances that your district was drawn to make it either more red or more blue? Almost certainly, it was. Whoever had the power at the time, in your state legislature, whether red or blue, it was they who held the marker on the state map to make it more likely that their team would win in the next even numbered year. And there dear reader, there is yet another problem, the tyranny of the two party system.

Look at my own dear Commonwealth of Virginia (which I love dearly), look at our current Governor’s race. What choices we have. God help us. And look at the scandal in the life of the current holder of said high office. Our choice for the GOP nominee was not made by ballot boxes, our choice was made in a convention, under which I would suggest the Tyranny of the few decided for the voiceless many.

What of the President? He is making Obamacare the linchpin of it all. Perhaps like all the huge programs of the past (Social Security, Medicare, et al), he should put it on the table enough to have some needed reforms made to the reform. Is he allowing it to be his own tyranny?

Enough.

The new tyranny is here, and she has been named, but she is not new, she is as old as history and she is Self. The statesman who sacrificed self on behalf of the people is long dead and buried. Today, we have politicians, who worship the idol of the Self in all its attributes:  divisiveness, self-aggrandizement, re-election and obstruction. The people are not their problem.

That’s why the government is shut down.

Washington, Richmond and your state capital are filled with politicians who are primarily interested in Self rather than serving. Perhaps you will say, it is a flaw in what our system has become. I say it is a problem of the heart. And hearts are only changed from the inside out. That is our hope, the One who served ultimately through His death and resurrection and is willing to change our hearts from the idol of Self to becoming a servant. Utopian? Maybe? Hopeful? Definitely, because of He who eschewed Self and died as a servant.

Leave a comment

Filed under culture

#balance

This video has been making the rounds, you may have already seen it. But I think it is an important warning to us all that have smartphones that we need to keep watch on our behavior and maintain some balance in life and pay more attention to people than screens. That phone in your hand, it’s a tool, its a device, its not a person.

1 Comment

Filed under culture, experience

being opposed

Being opposed is good for thinking. So says a coach of ceos. You can watch the TED talk below.

I agree.

I was in a meeting recently where understanding of a problem and subsequent solutions were sought. Honestly, in this conversation, I felt neither understood nor encouraged. However, I know those in this conversation have the greater good in mind. The value of additional/opposing opinions is that they make our thinking sharper.

In a feature on NPR, the story of a scientist who, in the 50s, sought the reason for childhood cancers in the UK. She discovered the reason through research, but her argument was sharpened by being opposed.

That’s what I am thankful to have experienced in that meeting. Being opposed sharpened my thinking and shook me from what is called “willful ignorance” or maybe, as I might call it, “rut thinking.”

I was telling a pastor friend about this. (This pastor is FREAKING out about the condition and direction he sees in the USA church.) He wondered if this could be an answer to what he sees as a decline of the USA church.

Could engaging with, say, post moderns (or whomever), about the church, or more importantly, about the biblical Jesus not just open conversations with these friends, but also sharpen our own thinking about this most important of topics? That, I think, is his question.

I think he is on to something. I recall a conversation a couple of months ago with a guy where we were talking about life and it became clear that a big part of where we differed a bit was our views of God. As we talked, our thinking was sharpened.

So, my question is, with whom are you collaborating, who provides you with opposition which helps you sharpen your thinking?

Links:
Margaret Heffernan: The dangers of “willful blindness” #TED : http://on.ted.com/dja4

NPR TED hour on making mistakes… http://m.npr.org/story/174030515

(I’m on my phone in a car so no imbeds today gang, sorry)

3 Comments

Filed under culture, definitions, seeking understanding, spiritual questions/musings/wonderings

Brené Brown: Listening to shame

So, From what Dr. Brown tells us, shame and guilt are all around us.  So I am grateful for the research she has done and that tons of people are thinking about this.

I’ really glad that she has figured out that vulnerability is necessary to deal with that, but, I ask, vulnerability with whom?

As I listened to this I realized that this is kinda like Romans 7:24 without Romans &:25 or 8:1, or its like the second half of 2 Corinthians 7:10 without the first half of the verse.

Something else, I loved was her emphasis on empathy.

But empathy without the Gospel is JUST “me too”… that’s not really enough is it? The real “me too” is what Lewis teaches us:

“we must get to the point when we say to God, ‘I can’t, you must”

I am thankful for Dr. Browns’ research. My prayer is that all those 4 million people will realize God is there for them…

“Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from gthis body of death? 25 Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!” (Romans 7:24-25a, ESV)

 

Leave a comment

Filed under culture, seeking understanding